Let’s Talk About ‘M’ (1931)

Reading Time: 5 minutes

But I… I can’t help myself! I have no control over this, this evil thing inside of me, the fire, the voices, the torment!

What M Means to Us

Some movies from the 1930s have aged better than others. M is one that has aged like a fine wine. It’s a chilling experience through and through. Any film that features children being kidnapped or hurt in any way instantly sets off alarm bells with me. Yet the mayhem in the kangaroo court that a group of criminals set up to ‘sentence’ the kidnapper might be even more alarming. The lighting and shadows are exceptional, as are the performances. There are many layers to M, and that’s what elevates it above most chilling thrillers still being made today.

–Lee McCutcheon


M is less a story of a murderer than it is of the community that encircles its villain. It is their response to the spate of murders of young children in the local area, and then, their bloodlust towards the culprit once he is apprehended, that makes up this film’s moral centre. How exactly Lang was able to make such a modern and mature film regarding heinous crimes in 1931 is impossible to reckon with, as is the fact that this was the German director’s first sound film. It is a technical marvel that is just as relevant now as when it was released.

–Cian McGrath


Mirroring Society

At its core, M is a film about the tension between order and chaos, individual guilt and collective responsibility. The story follows a city gripped by fear as a child murderer evades capture. As the police falter, the criminal underworld takes justice into its own hands. This culminates in a kangaroo court that forces viewers to question the nature of retribution. Director Fritz Lang uses this premise to probe deeper themes: the fragility of societal norms, the hypocrisy of moral outrage, and the psychological toll of isolation.

The film’s brilliance lies in its refusal to provide easy answers. Is Beckert a monster deserving of death, or a tormented soul trapped by his own compulsions? Lang doesn’t judge. Instead, he holds a mirror up to society, exposing its contradictions. The parallel between the police and the criminals, who are both desperate to restore order, simply underscores a biting irony in their pursuit of justice. Both sides blur the lines between right and wrong.

Released against the backdrop of rising political extremism in Germany, M eerily foreshadows the mob mentality and authoritarian impulses that would soon engulf the nation. Yet it ensures to universally resonate far beyond its historical context. It speaks to any society wrestling with fear and the urge to punish.

Suspense and Innovation

Fritz Lang’s direction is nothing short of revolutionary. Often cited as one of the first psychological thrillers, the film showcases his ability to weave suspense with artistry. Lang employs shadow and sound, which amazes given that M was his first ‘talkie’. He creates an atmosphere of dread that lingers long after the credits roll. The opening sequence, with its off-screen murder signaled by a child’s ball rolling into the frame, is a masterclass in subtlety, proving that what isn’t shown can be more terrifying than what is.

Lang’s use of sound is particularly groundbreaking. The murderer’s whistled tune, “In the Hall of the Mountain King,” becomes a chilling leitmotif (I just learned what this is), a signature sound that announces Beckert’s presence without revealing him. Hearing this heightens the tension each time. Think of classic slasher themes to signal Michael Myers or Jason Voorhees’ presence.

Visually, Lang’s expressionist roots shine through in the stark contrasts of light and shadow, the claustrophobic framing of Berlin’s streets, and the surreal nature of the underworld’s trial. Every shot is deliberate, every movement purposeful, creating a cinematic experience that feels both timeless and ahead of its time.

Peter Lorre and That Final Speech

Peter Lorre delivers a tightrope performance that few actors could manage. He is equal parts repulsive and one needing pity. With his wide, expressive eyes and trembling voice, Lorre transforms Beckert from a faceless predator into a deeply human figure at war with himself. Early in the film, he is a shadowy menace. As the narrative unfolds, Lorre peels back layers to reveal a character who is both perpetrator and prisoner. There are urges he cannot control that drive him.

Lorre’s physicality is mesmerizing with his nervous tics, the hunched posture, and the way he seems to shrink under the weight of his own existence. He doesn’t play Beckert as a cartoonish villain but as a man unraveling, caught between self-loathing and desperation. This complexity makes M more than a crime story, but a tragedy.

Lorre’s genius reaches its peak during his speech at his impromptu trial. It is a raw, anguished plea for understanding that is one of cinema’s most powerful moments. “I can’t help what I do!” he cries, his voice cracking as he describes the relentless torment of his compulsions. “Who knows what it’s like to be me?” It’s a gut-wrenching outburst, delivered with such intensity that it forces the audience to confront an uncomfortable truth: evil is not always a choice, but a burden.

The speech is the emotional and philosophical core of M. It shifts the narrative from a hunt for a killer to a meditation on guilt, free will, and empathy. The criminals, poised to execute him, are momentarily silenced. The viewer is left to grapple with the same question: What do we do with someone who is both victim and villain? Lang cuts away before a verdict is reached, leaving the ambiguity to fester. A bold choice that amplifies the speech’s impact.

M‘s Lasting Impact

M is a film that demands revisiting, not just for its historical significance but for its enduring relevance. Fritz Lang’s visionary direction crafts a world that is as beautiful as it is unsettling. Peter Lorre’s performance grounds the story. Together, they create a work of art that challenges us to look beyond the surface, to question our instincts, and to recognize the shadows within ourselves and society. Nearly a century after its release, M remains the epitome of cinematic excellence. A film that entertains, provokes, and inspires in equal measure.

Many widely regard M as a pioneering work in the psychological thriller genre, a blueprint for films that delve into the minds of both hunter and hunted. It would inspire thriller films for generations like Double Indemnity, Psycho, Seven, and The Dark Knight. Even Orson Welles cited Lang as a major influence. Traces of M’s claustrophobic tension and societal critique can be felt in Citizen Kane (1941) and Touch of Evil (1958). M’s influence is a testament to its artistry and foresight. Its ripples are felt in every shadowed alley of film noir, every psychological twist of a thriller, and every story that dares to blur the line between right and wrong.

What are your thoughts on Fritz Lang’s M and its lasting impact on cinema?

Author: Vincent Kane

I hate things.